HOME BUYING
ZONE
One2surf Logo TECH
SUPPORT
FOR
SALE
Hercules 3D Prophet II GTS 64Mb DDR
Labs - Home Introduction

Hercules 3D Prophet II GTS 64Mb DDR


Featured Product
Hercules 3D Prophet II GTS 64Mb DDR

Manufacturers Web Site


Sections
GeForce2 GTS Chipset Technology
Yesterday was, Today is
Performance
Our Verdict

Hercules 3D Prophet II GTS 64Mb DDR

Performance

When testing we used the Guillemot Drivers which shipped with the card (v5.22) and the latest Detonator reference drivers from NVIDIA's website (v6.18). Surprisingly we actually saw better results from the original drivers that shipped with the card which is a very good sign and should be seen as a mark for Guillemot's commitment to provide the best possible performance and optimisation for its customer's rather than just taking NVIDIA's drivers and sticking their logo on them.

We also compared it to a Leadtek Winfast 32MB version of the same chipset to have a proper comparison.

Overall Benchmark Results 3D Prophet Leadtek Detonator
3DMark 2000 - 1024 x 768 7019 6743 6986
3DMark 2000 - 800 x 600 8014 7862 7936
SYSmark 2000 186 184 185

Mad Onion 3DMark 2000

3DMark 2000 is one of the best 3D performance diagnostic benchmark software currently available. To provide a comprehensive result we ran under two resolutions 800 x 600 and 1024 x 768 both in 16-bit colour. We have also shown the differences between the Detonator and 3D Prophet's own drivers by displaying the CPU and Texture Rendering speeds.

Mad Onion 3DMark 2000

As can be seen by the 3D Mark results, the 3D Prophet clearly leads the pack, with interestingly enough with it's reference drivers, and not the Detonator drivers that have recently received all the publicity. We must also give credit to Leadtek's design as it comes in very well for a 32MB DDR card. Once you start getting into the higher resolution, the extra 32 Mg of DDR memory will really start coming into its own.

3DMark 2000 - CPU SPEED

3DMark 2000 - CPU SPEED (CPU 3D Mark)

Overall CPU Speed Results 3D Prophet Leadtek Detonator
CPU Speed - 1024 x 768 551 506 507
CPU Speed - 800 x 600 558 490 494

The Hercules drivers make major strides over the Detonator drivers in CPU Speeds and this is most certainly attributed to the coding of addressing the processor contained within the drivers. We do not have the specific coding of the drivers and are therefore unable to provide any further analysis.

3DMark 2000 - 16MB Texture Rendering Speed (FPS)

3DMark 2000 - 16MB Texture Rendering Speed (FPS)

Texture Rendering Speed 3D Prophet Leadtek Detonator
CPU Speed - 1024 x 768 380.8 370.7 391.8
CPU Speed - 800 x 600 433.2 430.6 440.5

Here is where it gets really interesting, do you use the supplied drivers from Hercules or do you indeed download and use the Detonator drivers? the choice is yours and will depend on what you use your computer for. It is clear from the above graph the Detonator drivers have the edge over Hercules supplied drivers when it comes down to Texture Rendering. Our advice would be for those of you using the system for Games go for the Detonator drivers, for those of you using it for general and/or business purposes then stick with the Hercules supplied drivers.

BAPCO - SYSmark 2000

SYSmark 2000 is an application-based benchmark that reflects today's leading edge software applications for Internet Content Creation and Office Productivity.

Obviously gone are the days when video drivers could make all the difference in the 2D benchmark. With 2D optimisation getting about as good as it's going to get or in fact you're going to need for that matter, these benchmarks are coming down to the speed of the CPU, hard drive etc and you could swap current video cards in and out all day long and see little or no difference.

Overall BAPco Results 3D Prophet Leadtek Detonator
SYSMark 2000 186 184 185

BAPCO - SYSmark 2000

SYSmark 2000 does not report back any major shifts between the drivers and the Leadtek video card. The corresponding differences are very small; the Hercules 3D Prophet does come out on top. According to the results we have obtained to date in our labs this is a fine score for the Hercules card, particularly for 2D benchmarks, and as mentioned earlier there is not much improvement that be achieved on 2D platform.

Prev | Next